翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ New Brunswick Route 14
・ New Brunswick Route 140
・ New Brunswick Route 144
・ New Brunswick Route 145
・ New Brunswick Route 148
・ New Brunswick Route 15
・ New Brunswick Route 150
・ New Brunswick Route 16
・ New Brooklyn, New Jersey
・ New Brooms
・ New Broughton Rangers
・ New Broughton Sunset Correctional Centre
・ New Broughton, Wrexham
・ New Brunswick
・ New Brunswick (disambiguation)
New Brunswick (Minister of Health and Community Services) v G (J)
・ New Brunswick (NJT station)
・ New Brunswick and Nova Scotia Land Company
・ New Brunswick Association of English-speaking Canadians
・ New Brunswick Bible Institute
・ New Brunswick Botanical Garden
・ New Brunswick Broadcasting Co v Nova Scotia (Speaker of the House of Assembly)
・ New Brunswick Broadcasting Company
・ New Brunswick College of Craft and Design
・ New Brunswick Community College
・ New Brunswick Confederation of Regions Party
・ New Brunswick Curling Association
・ New Brunswick dollar
・ New Brunswick East Coast Railway
・ New Brunswick electoral redistribution


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

New Brunswick (Minister of Health and Community Services) v G (J) : ウィキペディア英語版
New Brunswick (Minister of Health and Community Services) v G (J)
''New Brunswick (Minister of Health and Community Services) v G (J)'', () 3 S.C.R. 46, is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on right to legal aid services. The Court held that the denial of legal aid to parents whose custody of their child was challenged by the government is a violation of section 7 of the ''Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms''.
==Background==
The New Brunswick Minister of Health and Community Services gained custody of three children of J.G. for a period of six months. At the end of the six months the minister applied to extend it another six months. J.G. sought to argue against it and applied for legal aid under the provincial Domestic Legal Aid program. She was refused. She challenged the legal aid policy as a violation of section 7 of the ''Charter''.
The motions judge found that there was no violation. This decision was upheld at the Court of Appeal.
The issue before the Supreme Court was whether "indigent parents have a constitutional right to be provided with state-funded counsel when a government seeks a judicial order suspending such parents’ custody of their children."

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「New Brunswick (Minister of Health and Community Services) v G (J)」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.